Description
Using our intelligently designed and intuitive dataset, you can quickly understand how National Council For Behavioral Healthcare (NHC) is lobbying the U.S. government, how much they’re spending on it, and most importantly – the bills and specific issues on which they lobby.
Gain an informational edge with our Lobbying Data Intelligence. Perform analysis by company, lobbyist, lobbying firm, government agency, or issue.
For lobbying firms: understand your competitors. Understand who is registering with who. Gain insight on quarterly reports and specific issues other firms are lobbying on.
Our lobbying data is collected and aggregated from the U.S. Senate Office of Public Records from 1999-present and is updated on a regular basis. We utilize advanced data science techniques to ensure accurate data points are collected and ingested, match similar entities across time, and tickerize publicly traded companies that lobby.
Our comprehensive and advanced lobbying database is completed with all the information you need, with more than 1.6 million lobbying contracts ready-for-analysis. We include detailed information on all aspects of federal lobbying, including the following fascinating attributes, among much more:
1. Clients: The publicly traded company, privately owned company, interest group, NGO, or state or local government that employs or retains a lobbyist or lobbying firm.
2. Registrants (Lobbying Firms): Either the name of the lobbying firm hired by the client, or the name of the client if the client employs in-house lobbyists.
3. Lobbyists: The names and past government work experience of the individual lobbyists working on a lobbying contract. 3. General Issues: The general issues for which clients lobby on (ex: ENV – Environment, TOB – Tobacco, FAM – Family Issues/Abortion).
4. Specific Issues: A long text description of the exact bills and specific issues for which clients lobby on.
5. Bills Lobbied On: The exact congressional bills and public/private laws lobbied on, parsed from lobbying report specific issues (ex: H.R. 2347, S. 1117, Tax Cuts and Jobs Act).
6. Agencies Lobbied: The names of one or more of 250+ government agencies lobbied on in the contract (ex: White House, FDA, DOD).
7. Foreign Entities: The names and origin countries of entities affiliated with the client (ex: BNP Paribas: France).
Gain access to our highly unique and actionable U.S. lobbying database. Further information on LobbyingData.com and our alternative datasets and database can be found on our website, or by contacting [email protected].
Frequently Asked Questions
What is National Council For Behavioral Healthcare (NHC) lobbying for?
Summary of Lobbying Data:
– Lobbying Firms Hired: Natl Assn For Behavioral Healthcare
– General Issues Lobbied On: Medicare/Medicaid
– Specific Issues Lobbied On: Vaccine Mandate and Workplace Violence, Regulatory Relief, Medicaid IMD Exclusion, Mental Health Parity Regulations, Information Technology Legislation, Medicare Inpatient Psychiatric PPS Regulations, Medicare 190-day Lifetime Limit, Special Education Issues/IDEA, Medicare Partial Hospitalization Outpatient PPS, State Children’s Health Insurance Program, Residential Treatment, Healthcare Reform, Comprehensive Mental Health Reform, Substance Use Disorder Funding and Services, Coronavirus related packages, Telehealth and payment
– Government Agencies Lobbied: House of Representatives, Department of Education, Department of Health & Human Services (HHS), Senate, Department of Labor (DOL)
One could infer that the company National Council For Behavioral Healthcare is lobbying on these issues in order to influence healthcare policies that directly impact their business operations and bottom line. By lobbying government agencies and officials, they may hope to shape regulations and laws in a way that is favorable to their specific industry and patient population. They may also be advocating for increased funding for mental health and substance abuse treatment, which is a central part of their mission as a healthcare provider. The varied issues they have lobbied on suggest a comprehensive approach to healthcare policy, with a focus on expanding access to care, improving quality standards, and easing regulatory burdens for mental health and substance abuse treatment providers.
