Description
Using our intelligently designed and intuitive dataset, you can quickly understand how Lyondellbasell (LYB) is lobbying the U.S. government, how much they’re spending on it, and most importantly – the bills and specific issues on which they lobby.
Gain an informational edge with our Lobbying Data Intelligence. Perform analysis by company, lobbyist, lobbying firm, government agency, or issue.
For lobbying firms: understand your competitors. Understand who is registering with who. Gain insight on quarterly reports and specific issues other firms are lobbying on.
Our lobbying data is collected and aggregated from the U.S. Senate Office of Public Records from 1999-present and is updated on a regular basis. We utilize advanced data science techniques to ensure accurate data points are collected and ingested, match similar entities across time, and tickerize publicly traded companies that lobby.
Our comprehensive and advanced lobbying database is completed with all the information you need, with more than 1.6 million lobbying contracts ready-for-analysis. We include detailed information on all aspects of federal lobbying, including the following fascinating attributes, among much more:
1. Clients: The publicly traded company, privately owned company, interest group, NGO, or state or local government that employs or retains a lobbyist or lobbying firm.
2. Registrants (Lobbying Firms): Either the name of the lobbying firm hired by the client, or the name of the client if the client employs in-house lobbyists.
3. Lobbyists: The names and past government work experience of the individual lobbyists working on a lobbying contract. 3. General Issues: The general issues for which clients lobby on (ex: ENV – Environment, TOB – Tobacco, FAM – Family Issues/Abortion).
4. Specific Issues: A long text description of the exact bills and specific issues for which clients lobby on.
5. Bills Lobbied On: The exact congressional bills and public/private laws lobbied on, parsed from lobbying report specific issues (ex: H.R. 2347, S. 1117, Tax Cuts and Jobs Act).
6. Agencies Lobbied: The names of one or more of 250+ government agencies lobbied on in the contract (ex: White House, FDA, DOD).
7. Foreign Entities: The names and origin countries of entities affiliated with the client (ex: BNP Paribas: France).
Gain access to our highly unique and actionable U.S. lobbying database. Further information on LobbyingData.com and our alternative datasets and database can be found on our website, or by contacting [email protected].
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Lyondellbasell (LYB) lobbying for?
Summary of Lobbying Data:
Lyondellbasell, a chemical manufacturer, hired Ernst & Young Llp (Washington Council Ernst & Young) and Bracewell Llp for their most recently submitted lobbying contracts. They lobbied on various general issues, including Environment/Superfund, Fuel/Gas/Oil, Taxation/Internal Revenue Code, Government Issues, and specific issues such as tax reform base erosion proposals, energy tax issues, fuel fraud issues, proposed reductions in the deductibility of interest expense, and super fund pensions. They also monitored legislative actions on shareholder votes on executive compensation. The government agencies they lobbied include the Department of Energy, House of Representatives, Department of Justice, Senate, and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
Inference on Why the Company is Lobbying:
One could infer that Lyondellbasell is lobbying on these issues to protect their business interests in the chemical manufacturing industry, particularly with regards to tax reform and environmental legislation. They are keen on monitoring proposed changes to the tax code that may impact their business operations and are actively advocating for the maintenance of tax deductions that benefit chemical manufacturers. The lobbying efforts on environment/superfund issues, fuel/gas/oil issues, and energy tax issues suggest that the company wants to remain compliant with environmental regulations while maintaining a competitive stance in the market. The company is also closely monitoring the legislative action on shareholder votes on executive compensation, which may indicate potential concerns over executive pay scrutiny.
